AI-generated synthesis

Education — Türkiye · Synthesis

A major expansion of schooling and higher education, PISA results improving but below the OECD average, and debates about quality, inequality and the role of religion in schools.

Citoyen1 min read

Citoyen synthesis for the Education category in Türkiye. Grounded in the sector's quantitative data (MEB, TÜİK, OECD, UNESCO). All values are the latest realized observation available — never a forecast. Assessments are kept distinct from sourced facts. Data last updated: June 2026.

1. State of play — where the Turkish education system stands

A massive expansion. Türkiye has massively expanded its schooling and higher education in a single generation, driven by young demographics — a considerable educational effort.

PISA results improving but below the average. In PISA (OECD), Türkiye achieves results that are improving but below the OECD average, reflecting uneven quality despite the expansion.

Large inequalities. Results vary sharply by region (rural East vs urban West), income and gender — inequalities in access and quality are a central challenge.

A debate on religion. The place of religious education (İmam Hatip schools) and the orientation of curricula are a subject of social debate.

An expanding higher education. The number of universities and students has grown strongly; quality and fit with the economy's needs are key challenges.

Education & training

Turkey — PISA scores

454 score
2018
Source: World Bank· 2024
Citoyen indicator — real data · TR · 2026-06-15
Education & trainingPrimary KPI

Turkey — Education expenditure

3.1 % PIB
2022
Source: World Bank· 2026
Citoyen indicator — real data · TR · 2026-06-15
Citoyen indicator — real data · TR · 2026-06-15
Türkiye has massively expanded its schooling and higher education in a single generation.

2. Outlook — where the system is heading

Improving quality. Converting the quantitative expansion into quality (PISA results) is the central challenge.

Reducing inequalities. Closing regional and gender gaps is an equity challenge.

Skills and the economy. Linking education and higher education to the economy's needs (industry, technology) is a development lever.

The open questions. Three issues will shape the period: (1) improving quality; (2) reducing inequalities; (3) adapting skills to the economy.

PISA results are improving but remain below the OECD average, with large inequalities.

3. International comparison — Türkiye among its peers

Placed in its environment, Türkiye has a system that is rapidly expanding but with results to consolidate.

Three takeaways. (1) PISA: below OECD average, improving. Türkiye outperforms Brazil and Mexico, but remains below the EU and Germany.

(2) A remarkable expansion. The extension of schooling and higher education distinguishes the Turkish trajectory.

(3) Persistent inequalities. As in emerging economies, regional and gender gaps carry significant weight.

Education & training

Germany — PISA scores

500 score
2018
Source: World Bank· 2024
Education & training

Mexico — PISA scores

409 score
2018
Source: World Bank· 2024
Education & training

Brazil — PISA scores

384 score
2018
Source: World Bank· 2024
Education & training

Turkey — PISA scores

454 score
2018
Source: World Bank· 2024
International comparison — pisa_scores · TR · 2026-06-15

International comparison — education

CountryPISA maths (2022)SchoolingInequalities
Germany≈ 475highmoderate
European Union≈ 472 (OECD avg)highvariable
Mexico≈ 395risinglarge
Brazil≈ 379risinglarge
Türkiye≈ 453major expansionlarge regional

Sources: OECD (PISA 2022), UNESCO, MEB. "≈" denotes a rounding.

Data mobilized (data-journalism base)

DataValueSource
PISA scorebelow OECD average (improving)OECD PISA (Citoyen chart)
Schoolingmajor expansionMEB / UNESCO
Higher educationstrongly growingMEB
Inequalitiesregional, by genderTÜİK
Debatesrole of religionanalyses

Sources (national analyses and references)

Ministry of Education (MEB) · TÜİK · OECD (PISA 2022) · UNESCO.

Methodological note — the synthesis keeps sourced facts distinct from assessments, stays neutral, dates each figure, and does not extrapolate beyond the sources. All values are the latest realized observation available (no forecast). Note generated by AI, human review required. Same safeguards as the rest of the observatory.